Mapping Two Decades of Conflict Resolution Research: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Study

Abstract

This study offers a systematic bibliometric analysis of global conflict resolution research published between 2000 and 2025. Its aim is to identify publication trends, leading countries and institutions, influential authors, productive journals, and thematic developments within the field, serving as guidance for studies in guidance and counselling. Using the PRISMA protocol, data were solely retrieved from the Scopus database, limited to peer-reviewed English-language journal articles. The final dataset was analysed using VOSviewer to map co-authorship networks, institutional collaborations, citation patterns, and keyword co-occurrence. The results reveal a steady increase in the number of conflict resolution publications, with the most significant growth occurring from 2020 to 2025. The United States emerged as the most prolific contributor, followed by Germany, the United Kingdom, Canada, China, and Spain. Leading institutions such as the University of California, Utrecht University, Southwest University, Tel Aviv University, and Beijing Normal University demonstrate strong collaborative activity. Thematic mapping indicates a sustained research focus on interpersonal conflict, emotion regulation, communication, and peace education. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the structure and evolution of conflict resolution research and highlights opportunities for future investigation, particularly in education and counselling.

Keywords
  • Conflict resolution
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Guidance and counselling
  • Research trends
  • VOSviewer mapping
How to Cite
Kurniawan, S. J., Wiyono, B. D., Purwoko, B., & Aziz Zulazmi, M. (2026). Mapping Two Decades of Conflict Resolution Research: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Study. KONSELOR, 15(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.24036/02026151154-0-86
References
  1. Akgül, G., & Atalan Ergin, D. (2022). School counselors’ attitude toward online counseling services during the pandemic: The effects of resilience and digital self‐efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 59(8), 1672–1685.
  2. Angelelli, C. V., & Baer, B. J. (2015). Researching translation and interpreting. Researching Translation and Interpreting, 1–291. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707280
  3. Barash, D. P., & Webel, C. P. (2021). Peace and conflict studies. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=m98wEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT23&dq=Conflict+is+a+reality+that+is+difficult+to+avoid.+Conflict+can+arise+at+various+levels,+from+our+own+internal+conflicts+to+conflicts+between+individuals,+families,+groups,+and+ev
  4. Barragán Martín, A. B., Molero Jurado, M. D. M., Pérez-Fuentes, M. D. C., Oropesa Ruiz, N. F., Martos Martínez, Á., Simón Márquez, M. D. M., & Gázquez Linares, J. J. (2021). Interpersonal support, emotional intelligence and family function in adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105145
  5. Bickmore, K. (2008). Peace and conflict education. The SAGE Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, 438–444. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200486.n35
  6. Bojanowska, A., & Urbańska, B. (2021). Individual values and well-being: The moderating role of personality traits. International Journal of Psychology, 56(5), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12751
  7. Ceballos-Vacas, E. M., & Rodríguez-Ruiz, B. (2023). How do teachers and students deal with conflict? An analysis of conflict resolution strategies and goals. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 41(2), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.547241
  8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  9. Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2024). Working Through Conflict. Working Through Conflict. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003381556/WORKING-CONFLICT-JOSEPH-FOLGER-MARSHALL-SCOTT-POOLE-RANDALL-STUTMAN
  10. Gary T. Furlong. (2020). The Conflict Resolution Toolbox: Models and Maps for Analyzing, Diagnosing and resolving conflict. John Wiley & Són, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. https://books.google.com.vn/books?hl=vi&lr=&id=j2P5DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=The+Conflict+Resolution+Toolbox:+Models+and+Maps+for+Analyzing,+Diagnosing,+and+Resolving+Conflict&ots=WMePtWSLpN&sig=jL92wWgh6fgkAxhf1k-OVu_Ntag&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The Con
  11. Grammatikopoulos, C. (2022). Causes and implications of organizational school conflicts: A theoretical approach. International Journal of Education and Research, 10(2). www.ijern.com
  12. Guilherme, A. (2017). Understanding conflict resolution philosophically in a school setting: three different kinds of violence and dialogue. Journal of Peace Education, 14(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2017.1323728
  13. Hymel, S., & Darwich, L. (2018). Building peace through education. Journal of Peace Education, 15(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2018.1535475
  14. Ilfiandra, I., Nadhirah, N. A., & Suryana, D. (2023). Meta-ethnography of Local Wisdom Total Peace of Urang Sunda and Its Implications to Peace Pedagogy. Atlantis-Press.Com, 132–149. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-034-3_17
  15. Kibris, A. (2015). The Conflict Trap Revisited: Civil Conflict and Educational Achievement. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713516845
  16. Marchetti, R., & Tocci, N. (2021). Conflict Society: Understanding the Role of Civil Society in Conflict*. Conflict Society and Peacebuilding, 11–40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367818050-3
  17. Martínez-López, J. Á., Cano, J. M., Gómez, P. M., & E Silva, A. M. C. (2022). Analysis of the Perception of Conflict and Its Positive Resolution in University Students. Social Sciences, 11(11), 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11110529
  18. Muriuki, C. (2022). Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution. Journal of Developing Country Studies, 1, 25–36. https://www.academia.edu/download/110166945/1773.pdf
  19. Ogunbanjo, M., Olajide, D., Research, C. A.-I., & 2025, U. (2025). The Politics of Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-First Century World. Integral Research, 2(6), 63–93. http://integralresearch.in/index.php/1/article/view/336
  20. Oviedo, L. (2016). Religious attitudes and prosocial behavior: a systematic review of published research. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 6(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.992803
  21. Purwoko, B., Prawitasari, J. E., Atmoko, A., & Handarini, D. M. (2016). Keefektifan Konseling Resolusi Konflik untuk Mengatasi Konflik Interpersonal pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 4(1), 53–63. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph
  22. Raguz, M. (2021). Structural violence: Its many faces and challenges in research, policies, prevention, and intervention. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 49(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2019.1664716
  23. Ratu, B. (2022). Model Konseling Resolusi Konflik Untuk Pengembangan Budaya Damai Siswa Berbasis Nosarara Nosabatutu (Disertasi). [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung.]. https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ratu%2C+B.+%282022%29.+Model+Konseling+Resolusi+Konflik+untuk+Pengembangan+Budaya+Damai+Siswa+Berbasis+Nosarara+Nosabatutu+%5BUniversitas+Pendidikan+Indonesia%5D.+repository.upi.edu&btnG=
  24. Saleh, M. N. I., & Hanum, F. (2025). Approaches to implementing peace education in high schools for nonviolent conflict resolution. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2553004
  25. Stefani, L. (2019). Toxic to transformational leadership: Peace, reconciliation, and social justice as the paradigm. Peace, Reconciliation and Social Justice Leadership in the 21st Century: The Role of Leaders and Followers, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2058-880120190000008011
  26. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2006). Cultural intelligence and successful intelligence. Group and Organization Management, 31(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601105275255
  27. Türk, F. (2017). Evaluation of the Effects of Conflict Resolution, Peace Education and Peer Mediation: a Meta-Analysis Study. International Education Studies, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p25
  28. UNESCO. (2021). Tackling cyberbullying and other forms of online violence involving children and young people. 1, 1–7. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379486
  29. Väyrynen, R. (2022). To Settle or to Transform: Perspectives on the Resolution of National and International Conflicts. Springer, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13627-6_11